Bahrain’s Public Prosecution announced on Tuesday, October 27, 2026, that the High Criminal Court had issued prison sentences against three defendants in three separate security-related cases. The sentences ranged from two to ten years, with additional financial penalties imposed on some defendants and orders for the confiscation of seized items.

According to the Deputy Chief Prosecutor for Terrorism Crimes, the cases involved allegations of supporting Iranian attacks targeting Bahrain, obtaining sensitive information that was prohibited from circulation, and photographing locations where photography was restricted. The incidents occurred during the period in which the Kingdom was subjected to those attacks.

The investigations began after several security departments within the Ministry of Interior submitted reports concerning online publications and other activities. These included photographs, video recordings and comments expressing support for the attacks, as well as the circulation of sensitive information and images of restricted sites.

Following the reports, prosecutors questioned the defendants, interviewed witnesses and commissioned technical specialists to examine electronic devices seized during the investigations. The Public Prosecution stated that the forensic examination findings supported the allegations and formed part of the evidence presented in court.

The High Criminal Court examined the cases over several hearings. According to the prosecution, the proceedings included the legal safeguards applicable to criminal trials, including the presence of defence lawyers and opportunities for the defendants to present their arguments. The court subsequently imposed prison terms ranging from two to ten years, fines of 2,000 Bahraini dinars on some defendants, and confiscation orders.

The rulings highlight the legal consequences associated with national security offences, particularly those involving restricted information, sensitive locations and online content published during security incidents. The published statement did not specify whether the judgments were final or remained subject to appeal.

Source: Bahrain Public Prosecution, as reported by Al Bilad newspaper.